Loading...
Loading...
Case study details

A category-defining fintech needed to defend the head terms it had won and open new ones. Editorial had to feel like a publication, not a content farm.
Traffic was concentrated on three pages. Technical SEO had drifted — broken canonicals, drifted schema, page speed in the red. The editorial calendar was assembled by whoever was free on Friday. Compliance review was a four-week bottleneck on every post, which meant the calendar shipped a quarter behind reality.
We mapped the category by intent and built clusters where the brand could earn authority without competing with users’ banks. Technical SEO got a full rebuild — sitemaps, schema, page speed. We put one named editor in charge of each cluster, gave them a budget, and held them to a publish cadence.
The biggest unlock was compliance. We re-engineered the review process into a checklist writers ran themselves, with a single 30-minute review at the end. Cycle time dropped from four weeks to four days, and quality — measured by post-publish edits — actually improved.
Organic sessions nearly tripled over nine months. Average ranking on the team’s tracked terms moved from position 11 to position 3. The compounding effect kicked in around month four — classic behavior for editorial work that’s actually good.
“We finally have an editorial voice. Even compliance enjoys the work now — that’s a sentence I never thought I’d say.” Priya Vohra · Head of Content, Beacon Finance
The work moves into a defense phase from here — refresh-and-expand on the cluster pages that won, plus a partnership program with adjacent publications. The pod stays in place.
Tell us where you’re stuck. We’ll send a one-page diagnostic in 48 hours.
Start a conversation